Your rules. Enforced automatically.
Define an evaluation once and let the platform decide (automatically and in real time) whether each trader passes or fails, with the exact reason. No manual monitoring, no morning spreadsheet ritual.
Built for prop firms.
What you get. In detail.
The four levers
Profit target, maximum daily drawdown, maximum total drawdown, and time limit: set per named program (e.g. “Two-Step 100K”) and reused across every account you assign to it.
Unlimited variants
Any rule can be set to unlimited (no daily cap, no time limit, no target), supporting funded-account and flexible program designs without workarounds.
Multi-phase evaluations
Classic two-step and beyond: traders progress through stages before becoming funded, tracked per evaluation instance with each phase’s own rules.
Instant pass/fail
Every incoming balance and equity event re-evaluates the account in real time. Failures carry the exact reason (daily drawdown, total drawdown, or time expiry), so there is never a dispute about why.
Edit & re-judge
Change a program’s rules and the platform re-evaluates every running account against them: no recreating evaluations, no manual migration.
Live progress metrics
Target balance, daily and total floors, time left, max profit and max drawdown reached: per account, always current, visible to staff and to the trader.
Programs you can express. Including yours.
Classic Two-Step
The industry-standard evaluation.
- Phase 1: 8% target · Phase 2: 5% target
- 5% daily / 10% total drawdown
- 30 + 60 day limits
- Funded on phase-2 pass
One-Step Aggressive
One gate, tighter risk.
- Single phase · 10% target
- 4% daily / 8% total drawdown
- 30-day limit
- Higher fee, faster funding
Instant Funding
No evaluation: rules from day one.
- No profit target (unlimited)
- 3% daily / 6% total drawdown
- No time limit
- Drawdown rules are the product
Funded, No Deadline
Post-evaluation live account.
- No target, no time limit
- Daily & total drawdown only
- Runs until breached
- Pairs with payout eligibility rules
Swing Program
Built for position holders.
- No daily drawdown (unlimited)
- Total drawdown only
- Extended or unlimited duration
- Weekend-holding check disabled
Your Program
Four levers, any phases, any of them unlimited.
- Profit target: any % or none
- Daily / total drawdown: any % or none
- Duration: any days or unlimited
- Phases: one, two, or more
A breach, second by second. Watch the engine work.
The data makes the decision
The same equity event that carries the number triggers the evaluation. There is no polling cycle, no nightly batch, no window where a breach exists but nobody has looked yet.
The reason is recorded at the moment
The failure carries its exact rule and value: daily drawdown, −5.2%, at 14:32:07. When a trader disputes with screenshots, you answer with the recorded event that both of you can verify against their own dashboard.
The stop is guaranteed, not hoped for
After a short grace delay the account’s monitoring is stopped automatically, and reconciliation jobs re-issue the stop if a background task is ever lost. A failed account cannot quietly keep trading your capital.
Why firms switch. And what changes.
Manual evaluation doesn’t survive growth
At ten accounts, checking rules by hand is a chore; at a hundred it is a full-time job done badly. Morning spreadsheet rituals miss intraday breaches, timezone mistakes corrupt daily-drawdown math, and every ambiguous case becomes a support dispute where the trader has screenshots and you have a maybe. The firms that scale are the ones whose evaluation runs itself.
How the engine works
Rules live on named programs: profit target, daily drawdown, total drawdown, time limit, each optionally unlimited, across any number of phases. Every balance and equity event streaming in from MT4/MT5 re-evaluates the account in real time; a pass advances the phase, a breach fails the account with the exact rule and moment recorded, notifications fire, and the account’s trading is stopped automatically after a short grace delay.
What changes for your firm
Outcomes stop being arguable: every pass and fail carries its reason and is consistent with every other decision the engine has ever made. Traders trust results they can verify against their own dashboard, staff spend their time on programs and risk instead of arithmetic, and changing a program’s rules is a config edit with automatic re-judging, not a migration project.
Spreadsheet evaluation vs. the engine. Where disputes are born.
Detection
Next morning, when someone opens the spreadsheet. Intraday breaches slip through.
The same second the breaching event arrives, on every account simultaneously.
Consistency
Whoever checked, however they interpreted the rule that day.
The same rules applied identically to every account, every time.
Disputes
The trader has screenshots; you have a cell in a spreadsheet and a maybe.
A recorded reason, value, and timestamp both sides can verify.
Enforcement
Someone remembers to stop the account, eventually.
Automatic stop after a grace delay, with reconciliation guaranteeing it.
Common questions. Straight answers.
Four levers per program: profit target, maximum daily drawdown, maximum total drawdown, and time limit. Any of them can also be set to unlimited, which makes the same engine cover strict evaluations, relaxed programs, and funded accounts with no drawdown-only rules.